Guest column submitted by U.S. Senator Mike Crapo
Senators on both sides of the aisle have long agreed on the need to modernize and expand hard infrastructure, and infrastructure investments have traditionally been accomplished through bipartisanship and regular order. Traditional, hard infrastructure investments include funding of roads and bridges, transit, rail, airports, drinking water and wastewater infrastructure, ports and inland waterways, water storage and broadband infrastructure. The bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act focuses on those core elements.
We have to keep pace with Idaho’s rapid growth. Estimates indicate Idaho has more than 1,000 miles of highway in poor condition, and commutes have grown more than 11 percent over the past 10 years. According to the American Society of Civil Engineer’s Infrastructure Report Card, Idaho currently has 286 bridges considered to be “structurally deficient.” Projections also indicate bad roads cost Idaho drivers an average of $394 per year in repair costs. Further, the severity of wildfires makes clear we cannot let up in working to ensure firefighters and land management agencies have the resources necessary to prepare for wildfire response and reduce the threat of wildfires.
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act includes a number of priorities to help ease these and other challenges in Idaho:
These are just some of the many provisions Idaho would benefits from in this legislation.
It does not raise taxes. It reprioritizes the use of certain unused COVID-relief funds away from bailouts and idle funds, shifting them toward supply-side investments that will provide benefits to Idahoans for many years. Because this infrastructure spending focuses on long-term productivity rather than near-term demand, it will not be inflationary. In fact, it will counteract the inflationary pressures we are seeing as a result of excessive spending. This is especially critical right now, as rising prices impact families and small businesses across America. We were successful in keeping out of this bill changes to states’ Right-to-Work status and increased funding for the Internal Revenue Service.
This bipartisan investment in our nation’s essential infrastructure needs is far different from my Democrat colleagues’ partisan $3.5 trillion uncontrolled tax-and-spend proposals. I will continue to fight against this kind of partisan, irresponsible spending. We should instead be building on time-proven, pro-growth policies, such as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, not reversing them to fund a reckless spending spree.
# # #
Word Count: 714